Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.7 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14, 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-05-05 | 2015-10-27 |
| 6.38 x 3.06 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue gradient, Dark red and Lime Green | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has an overall score of 74.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A24 4G's 68.7 general score. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 design is lighter than Galaxy A24 4G, although it is a bit thicker and was released 8 years before. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has the older 5.1 version and Galaxy A24 4G has Android 14 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A24 4G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features much more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A24 4G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a lot better performance than Galaxy A24 4G, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and 1 GB less RAM memory. The Galaxy A24 4G features longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A24 4G, although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera and a smaller aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.