Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has an overall score of 93.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 score. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a notably older and a little bit heavier device than the Galaxy A25 5G, but Apple managed to build it just a little thinner anyway. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A25 5G works with Android 14 OS.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more brightness, a bit higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior storage for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G takes better pictures and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy A25 5G has a really longer battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.