Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | iOS 15.x |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's score of 79.9. Even though iPhone 13 Pro Max is older and heavier than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner. IPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G comes with Android 14 OS.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a much greater performance than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processor. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a display that is just as good as the Galaxy A25 5G one, although the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a better resolution of 1284 x 2778px, a quite better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite larger display.
Galaxy A25 5G has a much better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and video in poorly lited environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels camera.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little better battery life than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 15% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.