Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 score. IPhone X's body is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it was released many years before. Apple iPhone X has a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and much worse brightness, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little better pixel count per screen inch. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a larger sensor and a lot higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G has a really longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.