Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G's score of 79.9. Despite of the fact that the iPhone XS is way older than Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is somewhat lighter and a little thinner. The Apple iPhone XS features a lot better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS has a bit better display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has way less brightness and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a bit better pixels count in each display inch. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G features a superior battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2659mAh. Galaxy A25 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.