Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G, getting an 82.5 score against 79.9. Google Pixel 2 XL's construction is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than Galaxy A25 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lot lower screen density and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Galaxy A25 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same camera aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.