Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, with a overall score of 80 against 79.9. Even though the Google Pixel 3 is older than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's body is just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 3 features a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy A25 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.