Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having a overall score of 80.7 against 79.9. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 3 XL is extremely older than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a just a little worse display density and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much powerful processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.