Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, having a general score of 79.9 against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a a lot newer phone than Google Pixel 3a, but it is much heavier and a bit thicker. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has the newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version, so it provides some extra features.
Google Pixel 3a has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit worse pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.