Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, with a general score of 79.9 against 78.9. Even though the Galaxy A25 5G is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL, it's a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A25 5G has a newer 14 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version, so it offers lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite bigger screen. Google Pixel 3a XL features a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A25 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier camera sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.