Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 overall score. Google Pixel 4 is an a lot older device than the Galaxy A25 5G, but it is a bit thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Galaxy A25 5G features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.