Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, having an 82.9 score against 79.9. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. The Google Pixel 4a body is a bit thinner and a lot lighter than the Galaxy A25 5G, even though it was released many years before.
Google Pixel 4a has a very superior CPU than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM. The Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit inferior pixels amount in each inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light situations and a smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.