Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G, getting an 87.5 score against 79.9. Google Pixel 4a 5G is an much older phone than Galaxy A25 5G, but it's somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a little worse pixels count in each inch in the display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A25 5G shoots clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G features better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.