Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is much better than Galaxy A25 5G's score of 79.9. The Google Pixel 5 body is incredibly lighter and a bit thinner than the Galaxy A25 5G, although it was released 3 years before. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel count per inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a quite larger display.
Galaxy A25 5G has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Google Pixel 5 has a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G captures clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower video frame rate, a smaller sensor and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has improved battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.