Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2023-12-11 | -- |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.95 ounces | -- |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having a global score of 82.2 against 79.9. Both of these devices work with the same Android 14 operating system. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a way thinner and much lighter device than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a more MP back camera.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a battery duration that is very similar to the Galaxy A25 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.