Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than HTC One M9, with a 79.9 score against 77.7. The Galaxy A25 5G design is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One M9's, but it is also much heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides lots of additional features.
HTC One M9 features a very superior CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has less RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processing unit. The HTC One M9 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixels density.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G takes slightly better videos and photos than HTC One M9, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.