Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, having a overall score of 79.9 against 77. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's construction is noticeably newer, but a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the HTC U Ultra. The Galaxy A25 5G features a little sharper display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. HTC U Ultra has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera with way more megapixels.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.