Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than HTC U11's 77.6 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a notably newer device than the HTC U11, although it's heavier and a little bit thicker. Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better looking screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen.
HTC U11 counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking images and/or video in poorly lited environments and a smaller sensor taking worse quality pictures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.