Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than LG G7 Fit, having a score of 79.9 against 77. Although the Galaxy A25 5G is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it's incredibly heavier and a little thicker. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy A25 5G has the older 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same screen brightness, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG G7 Fit has a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less processing cores and 2 GB lesser RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a lot better resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and video and a larger camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy A25 5G has a way better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.