Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having a overall score of 81 against 79.9. These phones work with Android operating system, but LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version, so it offers a lot of extra features. Even though LG G7 ThinQ is incredibly older than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. LG G7 ThinQ features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same display brightness, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots slightly better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photographs in low-light environments and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a really longer battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.