Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting an 82.5 score against 79.9. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. LG V30S ThinQ is an noticeably older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but LG was able to make it lighter and somewhat thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little sharper screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a much lower pixel density and a way worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A25 5G features a superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way more MP camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.