Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having a overall score of 81.3 against 79.9. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is much older than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G count with very similar displays, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a much better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. The Galaxy A25 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.