Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's global score of 79.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Although LG V40 ThinQ is a lot older than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's body is a little thinner and lighter.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. Galaxy A25 5G and LG V40 ThinQ feature extremely similar screens, because although the LG V40 ThinQ has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a greater count of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a really longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way better 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.