Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 overall score. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Although LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Galaxy A25 5G, it must be told that it's also way older, a little thicker and a little bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel count per inch in the display. LG V60 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM. Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 50 mega-pixels resolution, a lot tinier sensor giving a lot lower image quality and a much worse (4K) video definition, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G and LG V60 ThinQ both count with really similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.