Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is slightly better than the Galaxy A25 5G, with a score of 87.1 against 79.9. The LG Velvet body is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A25 5G, although it was released 4 years before. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels in each display inch.
The LG Velvet counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The LG Velvet shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Galaxy A25 5G has greater battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.