Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Microsoft |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a general score of 85.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. Although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much older and extremely heavier than Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is still a lot thinner. These devices use Android OS, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a screen that is just as good as the display in Galaxy A25 5G, because although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has much less brightness, and they both have the same display pixels density, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1892 x 2688 pixels and a bigger screen.
Galaxy A25 5G has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G features a better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels.
Galaxy A25 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4449mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.