Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is better than Galaxy A25 5G, having a general score of 89.6 against 79.9. The Motorola edge is a incredibly older and somewhat thicker cellphone than Galaxy A25 5G, but Motorola could make it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola edge has older 10 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little sharper display than Motorola edge, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bit better screen pixel density. The Motorola edge has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
Motorola edge has a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM. The Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola edge counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola edge also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.