Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Even though Motorola Edge 20 Pro is notably older than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is a little thinner and just a bit lighter.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A25 5G has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixels density.
Galaxy A25 5G has more storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.