Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, with a score of 81.9 against 79.9. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Neo and Galaxy A25 5G were only released with a couple of months difference, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a little bit thinner and lighter. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 14 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a brighter display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much brighter display, a little higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with more storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G has improved battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4310mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the same video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.