Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, having an 87.1 score against 79.9. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body has the same weight than the Galaxy A25 5G, but it's just a little thicker. Both of these phones include the same Android 14 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and much more brightness.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a camera with a 50 megapixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.