Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, getting an 81.5 score against 79.9. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Moto G 5G is a notably older, somewhat thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A25 5G. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G 5G has older 10 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Moto G 5G counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back facing camera with more megapixels.
Moto G 5G has a battery performance that is very similar to Galaxy A25 5G's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.