Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Surfing blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus is just a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, getting a global score of 82.6 against 79.9. The Moto G 5G Plus construction is noticeably older, just a bit heavier and a bit thicker than Galaxy A25 5G. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Moto G 5G Plus has an extremely better processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus count with similar batteries. The Moto G 5G Plus shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with less MP, it also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.