Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the Moto G Power, having a 79.9 score against 76.1. Galaxy A25 5G is a a lot newer phone, and it's also thinner and just a little bit lighter than Moto G Power. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version while Moto G Power has Android 11, so it counts with some additional features.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit worse pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit bigger display. Galaxy A25 5G features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Moto G Power features a lot better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a much better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Moto G Power and Galaxy A25 5G count with similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.