Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a score of 79.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's design is a lot newer, just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G has greater battery performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.