Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G8 Power's 76 global score. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a more recent 14 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10, giving some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a somewhat thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, but they have equal weights.
The Moto G8 Power has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit bigger display.
Galaxy A25 5G takes better pictures and videos than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
Galaxy A25 5G features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Moto G8 Power and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G both count with really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.