Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2023-12-11 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. These devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy A25 5G has an older 14 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Galaxy A25 5G is a newer phone than Moto Z Force, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier.
Moto Z Force has a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and less cpu cores (although they are faster). Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better looking display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a way lower display density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.