Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a 79.9 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G construction is way newer, but incredibly thicker and a lot heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. The Moto Z2 Play features a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A25 5G features a really longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G takes better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.