Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3, having a 79.9 score against 77.6. Although the Galaxy A25 5G is way newer than the Motorola Moto Z3, it is extremely heavier and thicker. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A25 5G has the previous 14 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Moto Z3 has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better storage for apps and games than Moto Z3, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A25 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a much longer battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.