Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has a score of 79.9, which is a bit better than the Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 global score. The Galaxy A25 5G body is way newer than the Moto Z3 Play's, although it's somewhat thicker and notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G takes better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way better resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.