Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Oxford blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, having a general score of 84.6 against 79.9. Motorola One 5G's body is way older, a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A25 5G. The Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One 5G, although it has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, a little bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Galaxy A25 5G features slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola One 5G counts with an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G and Motorola One 5G feature really similar batteries. Motorola One 5G counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations and a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.