Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than the Motorola One Action, getting a 79.9 score against 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G design is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner, but heavier than the Motorola One Action. The Motorola One Action features a lot better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola One Action, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels. The Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 43% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.