Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting a 79.9 score against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G design is newer, just a little lighter and a little thinner than Motorola One Hyper. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a more recent 14 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11, offering a couple additional features.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better display than Motorola One Hyper. They have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a screen of the same size and a greater pixels count per inch in the display.
The Motorola One Hyper shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit more storage to install games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G has better battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.