Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is noticeably older than the Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is a little bit lighter and a little thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit larger display, a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has more memory for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a much greater performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79 percent more battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a lesser mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations and a way larger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.