Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 15 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | -- |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a 79.9 score against 79.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has the older 14 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen and way more opaque screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a 50 MP resolution camera and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A25 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 6 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.