Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Meteor grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a general score of 80.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G's overall score of 79.9. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the older 10 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Even being the best in this comparison, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW construction is way older, a bit thicker and heavier than the Galaxy A25 5G.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy A25 5G features a bit sharper display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a lot bigger camera sensor, better video frame rate and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.