Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting a global score of 80.8 against 79.9. Despite being the best in this review, the Nokia XR20 is a much older, way thicker and heavier device than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia XR20 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit better looking display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels quantity per display inch and much more brightness. Nokia XR20 counts with a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Nokia XR20, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a higher resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better battery performance than Nokia XR20, because it has an 8% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.