Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 79.9 score against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an older 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little bit higher amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a battery lifetime that is very similar to Galaxy A25 5G's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.