Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has a general score of 79.9, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. These devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features and improved performance. The Galaxy A25 5G design is incredibly newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a lot brighter screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with much more memory capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures better videos and photos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit superior battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.