Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a global score of 79.9 against 77.7. Both devices in this review work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has the newer 14 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is noticeably newer than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much greater performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a screen that is just as good as Galaxy A25 5G's screen, because although the OPPO Find X2 Neo has much worse brightness, and they both have a same size screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Neo takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a lower 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos and a larger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G has superior battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.