Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, with an 81.3 score against 79.9. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A31 has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Although Galaxy A31 is older and just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is still a little bit lighter.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit larger display. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A31, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A31 features a very superior processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a lot smaller sensor capturing lot worse quality videos and pictures, it also counts with a more MP camera in the back, a way higher (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G and Samsung Galaxy A31 feature similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.